I've recently had occasion to dig through
the past three Canadian censuses. In 1986, average family income in Canada
was $37,827. By 1991, this had grown to $51,342 in nominal terms, an
increase of 35.7%. Between 1991 and 1996, nominal income growth had
slowed, growing by only 6.3% to $54,583.
It would seem that, for the 1986 to 1996
decade, income grew considerably, but if one deflates nominal income by the
consumers price index (1986=100), one finds that this is not really the
case. During the 1986 to 1991 period, real family income did grow
considerably, from $37,827 to $40,683, or by 7.5%, about 1.5% per year.
However, during the following five year period, it actually shrank by slightly
more than one percentage point, from $40,683 to $40,253.
It probably would have fallen much further
if it had not been for two factors, a substantial increase in female labour
force participation during the 1986 to 1996 decade and a rapid rise in the
income of women. In real terms, women's average income rose by 10.4%
between 1986 and 1991 and by 1.7% between 1991 and 1996. In marked
contrast, men's income rose by slightly under 3% between 1986 and 1991 and
actually fell by over four percentage points between 1991 and 1996. While
increasing labour force participation was significant, rising real female income
may have been the most important factor in maintaining real family income at
approximately its 1991 level.
This should not be taken to mean that,
on average, women now earn as much or more than men. Though it may be
closing, a very large gap remains. In nominal terms, men, on average,
earned $31,117 in 1996, whereas women earned only $19,208, less than two-thirds
as much. It would seem that we are still a long way from achieving pay
equity.
Ed Weick
|
- Re: FW The power of women Ed Weick
- Re: FW The power of women Keith Hudson
- Re: FW The power of women Michael Spencer