I think Harry must be a touch proud of you... And no doubt that the DDT
ban was an inconvenience for population controllers. Short term
planning, however, as with all GM lines in agriculture, will backfire
because of the resistant vectors and weeds that inevitably emerge, not
to mention poisons to organic organisms. But then, the planners don't
actually expect be around to have to deal with the most resistant pests
and miscreations.
Population control is absolutely part of the plan by those who believe
that plebs, who must be controlled, will never do it on their own.
Dumbing them down for so long, many developing nations, including
families of Western nations' poor, are not given the means nor the
opportunities to educate themselves out of the cycle of overpopulating
their only home. Where education and employment opportunities have
advanced women's positions, fewer babies are being born because choice
is there.
Bertrand Russell's speculation about two congenitally different humans
already appears to have taken hold, but I would caution that appearances
can be manipulated to ensconce belief. I have more faith in the mind's
ability to change its mind and liberate itself of oppressive habitual
thoughts. I also maintain that a mind develops according to what it will
experience, while trying to accommodate its most inner desires and
foremost needs within given or chosen environments. Much will depend on
economic position, but much will depend upon positive or negative
influences at an early age. Lousy diet, education, drugs, and pollution
can weaken will, but on the other hand, "bred" resistance to
sensitivity, compassion, joy in creation, sharing and meaningful
communication will tear away at humanity, not to mention the planet, far
sooner.
Natalia Kuzmyn
BTW, I like the introduction to Chap. 14 of your posting:
POPULATION CONTROL
Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences
between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost
different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as
an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.
- Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society
With the restraints of moral conventions and democracy dispensed
with, the new utopia offers the holy grail of all dictators: Control
over life itself. Yet some of that control has existed for decades in
spite of our notionally free and democratic societies. Science offers
the great advantage that very few people can understand it. Whoever pays
for its conduct and its presentation in the popular media can dictate
the consensus on any given issue, simply by asserting that his committee
of experts are the most distinguished. The less well funded and
represented dissenters are labeled the dangerous 'quacks' and 'junk
scientists'.
And this is how the petrochemical-pharmaceutical cartel has killed,
injured, and sterilized millions of people over the last hundred years.
The same forces that supported Hitler have continued to operate covertly
ever since.
Population control is multi-faceted. It includes: Reducing the
number of people; eugenics; reducing intelligence levels; mind control;
increasing poverty; and creating financial dependence on the
pharmaceutical industry. Various facets of the population control agenda
can be served simultaneously by the same device.
Facing up to this 21st century holocaust merely requires an
acknowledgement of the moral position of its elevated sponsors. Some
might be unashamedly evil but most are Malthusians who believe that the
there is no sanctity in human life. To 'save the planet' we must kill
off most of the people, so said Jacques Cousteau in the UNESCO Courier
of November 1991:
The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics
- it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the
earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes ... This is a terrible thing to
say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000
people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not
to say it. (1) <http://www.policestateplanning.com/chapter_14_.htm#1>
Bertrand Russell, one of the twentieth century's most eminent
philosophers, said the same in his book, The Impact of Science on Society:
At present the population of the world is increasing ... War so far
has had no great effect on this increase ... I do not pretend that birth
control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing.
There are others ... If a Black Death could be spread throughout the
world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without
making the world too full...(2)
<http://www.policestateplanning.com/chapter_14_.htm#1>
Russell also supported the idea of engineering human beings to meet
social requirements:
Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy. . . . It is to be
expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give
governments much more control over individual mentality than they now
have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education
should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left
school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of
thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have
wished. . . . Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a
very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs
that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of
the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.
The Nazis were more scientific than the present rulers of Russia. . .
. If they had survived, they would probably have soon taken to
scientific breeding. Any nation which adopts this practice will, within
a generation, secure great military advantages. The system, one may
surmise, will be something like this: except possibly in the governing
aristocracy, all but 5 per cent of males and 30 per cent of females will
be sterilized. The 30 per cent of females will be expected to spend the
years from eighteen to forty in reproduction, in order to secure
adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemination will be
preferred to the natural method. . . .
Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between
rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different
species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an
organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.
(3) <http://www.policestateplanning.com/chapter_14_.htm#1>
The progressively dumbed down society described in Brave New World
is desirable to those in the ruling class who believe in 'command and
control'. However, with the internet serving as a counter-weight to
official disinformation, we can now afford ourselves some protection
against a health catastrophe we might otherwise endure at their hands.
Christoph Reuss wrote:
Natalia, talking about "Illuminati", what do you think of this:?
(Context & Refs see http://www.policestateplanning.com/chapter_14_.htm )
........
14.1 FUNDING POPULATION CONTROL
Displayed on Rockefeller University's website homepage on 3 December
2003, was a picture of a crowded city market with the following caption
beneath:
It took from the beginning of time until 1950 to put the first 2.5
billion people on the planet. Yet in the next half-century, an increase
that exceeds the total population of the world in 1950 will occur, So
writes Joel E. Cohen, Ph.D., Dr.P.H., professor and head of the Laboratory
of Populations at The Rockefeller University and Columbia University, in a
Viewpoint article in the November 14 issue of the journal Science.(4)
Limiting population growth has been a preoccupation of the European
and American elite throughout the twentieth century. The Population Council
was established in 1952 by John D. Rockefeller III. The multi-billion
dollar World Wildlife Fund is sponsored by British and Dutch Royalty and
the elite environmental think-tank, The Club of Rome, counts several world
leaders amongst its members. The U.N.'s population control activities
receive funding from all the major charitable foundations, especially the
Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation. Ted Turner's $1 billion United
Nations Foundation and the $24 billion Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
are entirely devoted to population control activities although they are
disguised as public health campaigns.
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) is the single largest
international source of overt funding for population and reproductive
health programmes. Since it began operations in 1969, the Fund has provided
nearly $6 billion in 'assistance' to developing countries.(5)The UNFPA only
manages one quarter of the world's population control budget for developing
countries, which is in excess of $1 billion per year.(6) The Netherlands,
Britain, and Japan were by far the biggest funders of UNFPA in 2001,
providing almost 50% of the total $396 million.(7) Meanwhile the U.S.
Agency for International Development (USAID) gives substantially more money
to population control programmes than to healthcare and food assistance.(8)
14.2 AIMS AND METHODS - THE ART OF KILLING QUIETLY
The population control agenda is presented to the public as a
universal concern for planetary resources and environmental pollution, and
to a lesser degree, socio-economic deprivation, women's rights, and
reproductive health. Whatever the truth of these arguments, the point is
that population 'control' is coercive. The policy papers on population
control contain objectives that are so extreme that coercion would
certainly be needed to meet them. The 1972 benchmark environmentalist
publication, The Limits To Growth, predicted planetary meltdown by 2050
unless radical limits to population growth were imposed. In 1974, this was
translated into hard U.S. national security policy by National Security
Advisor, Henry Kissinger. His lengthy National Security Study Memorandum
200 laid out the aims, timescale, and methods of U.S. foreign policy for
limiting the population growth of 'lesser developed countries'.(9) Measures
were to be taken to keep the world's population growing beyond 8 billion,
meaning 500 million fewer people by year 2000 and 3 billion fewer by 2050.
However, many suspect that this is nowhere near the real target of the
elite and their Malthusian collaborators, which is to cut the world's
current population in half. The American population control think tank,
Negative Population Growth Inc., recommended in 1992 that the population of
the U.S. should be 125-150 million, requiring a 50% cut from its current
level.(10) In 1995, the same think-tank published a study recommending an
80% reduction in global population. (11)
In NSSM 200, Henry Kissinger stated that no single approach would
'solve' the population problem. Multiple and seemingly unconnected
approaches are also less likely to attract attention. Here follows a
short-list of these approaches.
14.3 ENVIRONMENTALISM
The environmental movement has been an important tool for justifying
population reduction. As The Daily Telegraph recently reported, banning the
pesticide DDT in the early 1970s was a huge victory for the population
controllers. DDT was introduced as an insecticide in the 1940s and promised
to eradicate malaria, one of the world's biggest natural killers. Despite
all the scientific evidence to the contrary, the powerful environmental
lobby declared it dangerous, and so it was banned. As a result, hundreds of
millions of lives have been lost to malaria unnecessarily.(12) Alexander
King, president of the The Club of Rome, confirmed the real purpose of the
ban:
My own doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two
years, it had almost eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT,in
hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem.(13)
.........
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
