On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:01:45PM -0500, des...@verizon.net wrote: > "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <joh...@myrkraverk.com> writes: > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:05 PM, <des...@verizon.net> wrote: > >> "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <joh...@myrkraverk.com> writes: > >> > >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Thomas Adam <thomas.ada...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> On 5 February 2010 09:36, Johann "Myrkraverk" Oskarsson > >>>> <joh...@myrkraverk.com> wrote: > > > > Ok, this thread is filled with misunderstanding, and I apolagize for > > not being clearer. > > > > I use the xkb option altwin:meta_win so my windows key actually > > generates the Meta event: > > > > KeyRelease event, serial 142, synthetic NO, window 0x1c00001, > > root 0x1a6, subw 0x0, time 1299299808, (-4,173), root:(696,558), > > state 0x40, keycode 115 (keysym 0xffe7, Meta_L), same_screen YES, > > XLookupString gives 0 bytes: > > XFilterEvent returns: False > > Looks like a keysym, not a modifier.
Indeed. But it could all be tied together, with the output from: xmodmap -pm > To discuss, send replies to Fvwm.org. Normally you will get > cc'd unless you say you are subscribed. You mean you haven't attempted to try and get a consultancy fee from the off-list reply, Dan? That's my standard response to erroneous misuse of an email client these days. :P -- Thomas Adam -- "It was the cruelest game I've ever played and it's played inside my head." -- "Hush The Warmth", Gorky's Zygotic Mynci.
