On Mon 2014-05-12 11:26 , Thomas Adam wrote:
> On 11 May 2014 17:57, E Frank Ball III <fra...@frankb.us> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 02:28:19PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote:
> > >
> > > FVWM is still an active project as you can see it on the mailing lists
> > > but it's true that there are many parts in the code which could be
> > > removed but that's not so easy. FVWM is over 20 years old and many things
> > > were growed over the time and interlaced with each other.
> > How will the new display managers (if that's the correct term) such as
> > Wayland and Mir effect fvwm? Does it have to be ported to Wayland to work?
> Yes, FVWM would have to be a Wayland Compositor to be able to work correctly.
> Good luck with that.
> If I were you, I'd let the FUD die down about Wayland and concentrate
> on fluffier things.
So, what's the relationship between your aforementioned private
FVWM cleanup effort  and wayland?
> -- Thomas Adam
And what are plans of current active FVWM developers re. wayland
Let me note that FVWM absolutely fits my needs.