Please disregard the previous message. This one contains the correct code. (Damn KDE clipboard!) On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:10:09AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have found all the JAPHs with no alphanumeric > characters both interesting and instructive. > However, none of them write to stdout, > since they all use the `$_` trick. > > This leads me to conjecture that: > > It is impossible to write a JAPH that writes to stdout > without using at least one alphanumeric character. This conclusion does not follow logically. :) > I await the refutation. Enjoy! ''=~("(?{".('}_).} "*}_} }./}(}_ }}_, (}_+}_,*"'& ~'/- + *,+ < + :- /:- << :- @'| ' `` @ `` ` @ ` ` ` ')."})"); Inspired by Abigail and Japhy's recent postings. Ronald
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Paul Cotter
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbe... Scott R. Godin
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Robin Houston
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Michael J Assels
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Robin Houston
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Larry Shatzer
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Ilmari Karonen
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Andrew . Savige
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Ronald J Kimball
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Robin Houston
- RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Ronald J Kimball
- RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Bicknell, Frank
- RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Selector, Lev Y
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Ronald J Kimball
- RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Selector, Lev Y
- RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Andrew . Savige
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Andrew . Savige