Please disregard the previous message. This one contains the correct
code. (Damn KDE clipboard!)
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:10:09AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have found all the JAPHs with no alphanumeric
> characters both interesting and instructive.
> However, none of them write to stdout,
> since they all use the `$_` trick.
>
> This leads me to conjecture that:
>
> It is impossible to write a JAPH that writes to stdout
> without using at least one alphanumeric character.
This conclusion does not follow logically. :)
> I await the refutation.
Enjoy!
''=~("(?{".('}_).} "*}_} }./}(}_ }}_, (}_+}_,*"'&
~'/- + *,+ < + :- /:- << :- @'|
' `` @ `` ` @ ` ` ` ')."})");
Inspired by Abigail and Japhy's recent postings.
Ronald
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Paul Cotter
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbe... Scott R. Godin
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Robin Houston
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Michael J Assels
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Robin Houston
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Larry Shatzer
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Ilmari Karonen
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Andrew . Savige
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Ronald J Kimball
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Robin Houston
- RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Ronald J Kimball
- RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Bicknell, Frank
- RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Selector, Lev Y
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Ronald J Kimball
- RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Selector, Lev Y
- RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Andrew . Savige
- Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers Andrew . Savige
