1) _The Copper Scroll_ by Joel C. Rosenberg (Tyndale, 2006) caught my attention
because the advertising claimed that the scroll was uncovered in 1956. There
was a 1956 New York Times article, but there was also a 1952 NYT article (1
April 1952, p.13 col. 6) following the 20 March 1952 discovery. The novel
itself gets the 1952 date right, but much else there is unreliable. Since I've
read the novel--which I can't really recommend as literature--here are a few
comments, in case there's interest in this case of popular (mis)represention of
the scrolls. The book involves a search for the "Key Scroll" and then the
deposits, and also the Ark of the Covenant, with lots of killing, and political
and religious assertions along the way. Of course the Copper Scroll does not
lack speculative narrative attractions, and the book to some extent makes use
of this. The "Acknowledgments" lists some bibliography, but lacks, e.g., Milik,
Puech, and _Copper Scroll Studies_ (2002)

In this book Essenes lived by the Dead Sea "around 200 BCE" (102). The Shrine of
the Book display includes "ink-stained quills" (103). The Isaiah Scroll is the
"oldest Biblical manuscript ever found" (103). Scrolls include "a journal of
daily life" (108). "Father Bargil Pixner....was a member of the original
team...who discovered the Copper Scroll..." (174).
Typos: "Erin's "closet [closest?] friend at the CIA"(21); "He wore small a
yarmulke" (107); "Hold one, Jack Knife, hold one..." [should be "Hold on..."]


2) September BAR apparently includes an article by Y. Magen claiming Qumran was
primarily a factory for exporting pottery. The Brown University Qumran
Conference volume chapter that makes this claim, in my view, is one of the
chapters that is not reliable and may well be read with caution. Some of the
other chapters are more helpful.

best
Stephen Goranson
http://www.duke.edu/~goranson

_______________________________________________
g-Megillot mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot

Reply via email to