>>> On 3/15/2008 at 4:03 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> On 3/14/2008 at 1:35 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo > Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:42:05PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: >>> I think that with the removal of the srclib directory from the SVN trunk >> repository, we have completed everything that we thought needed to be done >> before creating the 3.1.x stable branch. >> >> Agree (sorta), as I was expecting also as part of this removal to have all >> #ifdefs for compatibility with apr 0.9.x removed and which will otherwise be >> problematic to support without intrusive changes going forward. >> > > Right. I'll get the #ifdef's removed as well. > >>> I am proposing that we create the 3.1.x branch on Monday (3/17). >> >> Considering how intrusive the changes are it will be better to delay that >> for >> a little longer, otherwise we will found ourselves destabilizing the branch >> with fixes required to get the snapshots in good shape to be used for >> testing >> (as ganglia now barely builds and has known problems running in some of the >> popular supported architectures). >> > > OK, then let's get some snapshots tarballs going on TRUNK and get this stuff > worked out. If we delay a week, will that be long enough or is there more to > it than I am seeing? > >
I just submitted the patches to remove the APR 1.2 ifdef's. How close are we to getting the snapshot tarballs going in TRUNK? How close are we to declaring that it is time to branch 3.1.x? Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
