>>> On 1/25/2009 at 2:49 PM, in message <[email protected]>, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 08:52:45AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote: >> >> Are we finished hashing this whole patch out yet? > > haven't seen many comments from other testers of the simplified patch, > but considering that it has been included already in the 3.1.1 stable > package from Gentoo x86, I'd assume it is "hashed out" already. > > Fedora and Debian are also testing patches for their packages AFAIK. > >> Are we ready to apply the current patch to 3.1.2 and release or is there >> still more discussion going on? > > guess it depends on how you define "current patch" as the backported > patch has still one hunk that was originally meant to be for gmetad's > multi request proposed feature that is still under discussion and hasn't > been committed yet (a second hunk was reverted already as it showed a > regression in the web frontend while testing the proposed Fedora package > update that was using it). > > in any case to avoid further delays (even if IMHO not ideal, but better > than the current situation) committed the backported patch in r1959 for > ganglia-3.1. > > also committed r1960 to make the new introduced feature (returning and > empty response instead of the full tree if the request to the interactive > port is invalid) consistent. >
I propose that we tag and roll a testing tarball for 3.1.2 and push it out to the testing site. Let's give it a week and if testing doesn't find any regressions in the 3.1.2 tarball, we release it. Bernard, are you around and available to tag and roll a 3.1.2 tarball? Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
