On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:40:53AM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: > > Wow... what a long thread...
Sorry about that boss, but also sent an "executive" summary in : http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg05398.html Hope you don't mind reading instead that one or my small enough for a tweet comment on the STATUS page for 3.1 > IMHO, the best solution here is to look at apache's main loop > implementation and adapt our code. This way, (hopefully) we will get > what we want (late initialization) without modifying any apr code. > Carlo, since you seem to be on a roll here, could you please kindly: I think I'd made my point of view clear, including alternatives and a probe of concept implementation of my preferred resolution which still keeps a "fix" for the problem this regression was meant to help with. If you are interested on implementing alternative 3 (if that is even possible) or 4 feel free to do so, but considering this is a showstopper for 3.1.6 and that we (would assume) want to get that released without regressions and ASAP then would recommend instead we focus for now in a fix for this regression which will mean either : 1) revert the code and delay a solution for the child notification issues 2) implement the child notification using something we know works like the code proposed (at least for now) instead of reordering the initialization and breaking all the BSD (and who knows what else) with that. Carlo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
