On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:16:10AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >>> On 3/3/2008 at 1:14 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > this means IMHO that supporting static builds without srclib won't be 
> > possible
> > (specially considering that apr was also scheduled to be removed) and that
> > there only 2 options going forward :
> > 
> > 1) drop support for static builds and therefore all of srclib (including
> > confuse)
> > 
> > 2) update srclib and keep it in tree for static builds
> 
> Obviously I am for dropping the static build stuff.

Agree, but wanted to clarify what the tradeoffs will be and what this means as
well for confuse (which so far was sparing the ax)

> However if we want to keep it, I would suggest that rather put the source in
the repository, we supply pointers to the tarballs and documentation on how to
build for static.  In other words, the doc would basically say, untar the
tarballs in the srclib directory.  Specify --enable-static which will 
automatically look for all three libraries in the srclib directory.

This will just add complexity in both sides (our configuration and the users)
for no advantage IMHO.

>  Optionally (if desired;) we could use the --with-aprlib= --with-expat= 
> --with-libconfuse= that will indicate where the source is at.

--with-library is really the only way to force a static library link (with
sources that had been rearranged to be used without being installed) based on
the autotools setup we have.

agree that we are going to need to document well, how that can be done though
so that users/distributions will be able to get a static ganglia if needed.

Carlo

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to