Hi all,
There has been some discussion about which version of autotools to use for bootstrapping 3.1.2 was bootstrapped with automake 1.9.6 and autoconf 2.59 3.1.4 was bootstrapped with automake 1.9.2 and autoconf 2.59 Some people test an alternative tarball bootstrapped with 1.10.1 and autoconf 2.61 3.1.5 has been bootstrapped with automake 1.10.1 and autoconf 2.61 and is the same code as 3.1.4, just a different bootstrap There are a few questions now: a) is it preferred that we release 3.1.4 or that we release 3.1.5, or a third option, roll a 3.1.6 tarball using the same environment where 3.1.2 was bootstrapped? b) should the choice of bootstrap environment be locked for all 3.1.X, and only changed when increasing the minor version number (e.g. when we go from 3.1 to 3.2)? c) what environment should be used to bootstrap 3.2.X/trunk? d) Can anyone volunteer to provide a stable bootstrap environment (e.g. a virtual server) just for Ganglia? Two such environments may be needed, one for trunk and one for the current release branch. Regards, Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
