On Jul 14, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Bernard Li wrote: > I'm open to suggestions on what directory they should be placed in, > but IMHO they should not be in the top level. Perhaps we could rename > "ganglia_contrib" to "ganglia_thirdparty" and place those projects > there? >
If we've got a large diversity of projects, I think it makes sense that the top level be a little busy. I think that's actually much easier to understand than a catch-all repo called third_party which has all manner of semi-related stuff. I'm thinking about the commit history, wiki, or issue tracker for a 'third_party' repo, and I think it would be a big mess. Worse that having many projects at the top level. If jmxetric or gmetric4j can be folded into one of the existing ganglia projects, that sounds fine. But creating a catch-all doesn't seem like a good idea. Agree/disagree? alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
