On 03/02/15 22:59, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > I'm one of the CK developers interested. It's been a PITA to find time > to get a DD to sign a key in person. Samy has just started a new company > and I'm pretty sure that's kept him busy enough that he's had trouble > finding the time too. The problem with getting onto the build machines > was getting the key signed. That's an orthogonal problem, we can take > that up off-list.
Sooner or later we'll get that sorted out - there are Debian Developers just about everywhere these days. > I've got a patch using APR rwlocks. Working with Vlad to get it tested > in our environment. The future changes requiring CK would be much more > invasive than just the change to remove it, so from a release > engineering perspective, I don't see any reason to start from here as a > branch point. I can fish out the commit with all the configure stuff > when that actually happens. > If you think it is feasible, you could also have both, using pre-processor conditional logic and an option to the configure script. Distributions would build it the normal way and there would be no need for branching in the repository. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
