http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/02/22/430779/breaking-bush-appointee-finds-doma-unconstitutional/

*BREAKING: BUSH APPOINTEE FINDS DOMA
UNCONSTITUTIONAL<http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/02/22/430779/breaking-bush-appointee-finds-doma-unconstitutional/>
 | *Moments ago, Judge Jeffery White of the District Court for the Northern
District of California ruled <https://twitter.com/#!/LambdaLegal> that the
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violates the Constitution’s equal protection
clause in a case brought by Karen Golinski. Golinski, represented by Lambda
Legal, “was denied spousal health
benefits<http://www.lambdalegal.org/in-court/cases/golinski-v-us-office-personnel-management>
by
her employer, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.”
White was appointed to the court by President George W. Bush in 2002. The
decision represents a serious setback for House Speaker John Boehner
(R-OH), whose Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) defended DOMA after
the Obama administration announced it would no longer defend the law.

Read the full judgement at:
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/doma-opinion.pdf

The Court has ruled that considerations of discrimination against people
based on sexual orientation should be held to heightened scrutiny for all
four factors that determine such scrutiny:

HISTORY OF DISCRIMINATION: The first factor courts consider is whether the
class has suffered a history of discrimination. There is no dispute in the
record that lesbians and gay men have experienced a long history of
discrimination.

ABILITY TO CONTRIBUTE TO SOCIETY: Similarly, there is no dispute in the
record or the law that sexual orientation has no relevance to a person’s
ability to contribute to society.

IMMUTABILITY: Regardless of the evidence that a tiny percentage of gay men
or lesbians may experience some flexibility along the continuum of their
sexuality or the scientific consensus that sexual orientation is
unchangeable, the Court finds persuasive the holding in the Ninth Circuit
that sexual orientation is recognized as a defining and immutable
characteristic because it is so fundamental to one’s identity.

POLITICAL POWERLESSNESS: The Court finds that the unequivocal evidence
demonstrates that, although not completely politically powerless, the gay
and lesbian community lacks meaningful political power… Although this
factor is not an absolute prerequisite for heightened scrutiny, the Court
finds the evidence and the law support the conclusion that gay men and
lesbians remain a politically vulnerable minority.




-- 
-- 
ADITYA BONDYOPADHYAY
Development Sector Consultant
Advocate (Regd. No. F-218/192 of 1997, Bar Council of W.Bengal, India)

Website: http://adityabondyopadhyay.webs.com/
================================
Notice to all recipients:
Communication not intended for you but reaching you inadvertently needs to
be treated as confidential and destroyed or deleted immediately. Use of
such communication in a manner prejudicial to the interest of Aditya
Bondyopadhyay and/or his principals, and/or his clients, and/or his agents
respectively, may attract legal proceedings which may be of a civil or
criminal nature.

Aditya Bondyopadhyay and/or his principals, and/or his clients, and/or his
agents respectively cannot be held liable or accountable for any and every
communication reaching out through this email account that is an unaltered
forward of another communication received by this email account, or a
referred source available on the internet and accessible to the public.

Reply via email to