Well a critique of what Chetan Bhagat wrote has appeared in the Hindustan Times today and is extremely articulate - Aditya B
*Dear Chetan Bhagat, you suggest homosexuality must be tolerated. Why? - * *Dhruba Jyoti Purkait <http://www.hindustantimes.com/Search/search.aspx?q=Dhruba%20Jyoti%20Purkait&op=auth>, Hindustan Times* New Delhi, September 10, 2014 - Dear Mr Bhagat, I was thrilled this week when I saw your article on section 377. Though you aren't on my bucket list of novelists, I think you're an intelligent man with enormous agency to effect change. But as I read on, sir, I must admit I was disappointed. While you certainly had done your research, I felt a distinct lack of empathy in your exhortations. You argued that there are 100 million of us queers, which apparently is a compelling reason to give us rights. The Supreme Court, however, recently showed how a question of numbers can be easily subverted to deny a "minuscule minority" its rights. Surely, liberties are grounded in the doctrine of humanity, not numbers, and even if there are 10 queer people, it is reason enough to grant them their due. Secondly, you suggest homosexuality must be tolerated since rights catalyse economic growth. I'm not so convinced, however, that people let go of their prejudices if it boosts their income. Even in the US, where your example is borrowed from, activists worked for decades in alliance with other movements to bring queer rights to the forefront before companies joined the bandwagon last year. And in any case, I'm not sure corporate growth is a great reason since queer communities comprise all socio- economic classes and the middle-salaried class isn't the only one deserving of rights. Moreover, the queer rights movement in India stands in solidarity with others fighting for justice, such as tribals, lower castes, disabled and women, many of whom have been denied rights by the same corporates as there is no "income-growth" involved in letting go of certain prejudices. But most of all, sir, what hurts is your condescending advice to the gay community, asking them to not indulge in "western-inspired gay parades". Tellingly, you chose to omit the word "Pride" from your description, hence failing to see the whole point of pride marches. You see, sir, this is more than just a dharna- this is a celebration of a people who have been discriminated against in the vilest of ways and fought back against oppressive social hierarchies. The colourful costumes and singing-dancing that 'freak out' the majority laud a rainbow coalition of people- from trans and bisexual to gay and intersex individuals- who aren't going back into the closet, having struggled to be at peace with their own identities. Some of them face insidious daily discrimination, others unimaginable violence and the rest have own personal battles. Walking along side them are young people, artists, allies and thousands of others, none of whom are ashamed of who they are. I cannot think of a better reason to celebrate. There is a constant othering in your writing, sir that frames section 377 as a question of the majority tolerating a minority section. In reality, this is a bigger human rights issue, since the provision impinges on basic civil liberties. That is why it is a collective sin, since it affects all hues of people- cis, trans; gay, straight- and dehumanises people by dictating personal behaviour. Section 377 is as much about straight majorities as it is about queer minorities. Just because LGBT people are brutalised while straight people escape the assault, one shouldn't overlook that the law criminalises 'acceptable' sexual behaviour of heterosexual people. Or the fact that the sentiment behind the law is the same that indulges in honour killings or caste atrocities. Sir, one needn't be an apologist to demand one's rights and we queers are certainly not aiming to calmly stand in line for our dole; just as no one asked Gandhi or King to go back home and wait for their time to come, we would appreciate it if no one treated us like a petulant child. I am sorry to disappoint you sir, but we think being who you are and wearing what you please without judgment is cool and we aren't going back into the closet. An ex-admirer See more at: http://www.hindustantimes.com/comment/analysis/dear-chetan-bhagat-you-suggest-homosexuality-must-be-tolerated-why/article1-1262263.aspx?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+HT-Dontmiss+%28HindustanTimes.com+-+Common-DontMiss%29#sthash.AnvK9TiX.dpuf On 7 September 2014 13:33, Superdavid superdavi...@gmail.com [GAYBOMBAY] < gaybom...@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > I am not sure how many of you all hav seen Chetan Bhagats article > yesterday in TOI where he has openly supported the repeal of 377. > It's good to hear such a thing from a staunch Modi and BJP supporter but > some of the things mentioned in the articles were not only shocking but > disgusting. > He clearly mentioned gay people should not come out on streets and protest > and have pride marches as the country is not ready for it. But the law > needs to be repealed as it will create good environment for business. > I find both the arguments naive. Since when did businessmen start thinking > of rights of people and then decide whether to invest or not? It's one > thing to have a friendly LGBT policy in the company and completely > different thing to decide to invest or not based on rights of people. I > have never seen any multi national pulling out of a country because same > sex is criminalise there. > Also we don't need support of such people who tell us to remain in closets > even If your sexual orientation is legalised. > > I don't know what others feel, but may be somebody needs to respond to > that piece and may be in TOI itself. > > -- -- ADITYA BONDYOPADHYAY Development Sector Consultant Advocate (Regd. No. F-218/192 of 1997, Bar Council of W.Bengal, India) Website: http://adityabondyopadhyay.webs.com/ ================================ Notice to all recipients: Communication not intended for you but reaching you inadvertently needs to be treated as confidential and destroyed or deleted immediately. Use of such communication in a manner prejudicial to the interest of Aditya Bondyopadhyay and/or his principals, and/or his clients, and/or his agents respectively, may attract legal proceedings which may be of a civil or criminal nature. Aditya Bondyopadhyay and/or his principals, and/or his clients, and/or his agents respectively cannot be held liable or accountable for any and every communication reaching out through this email account that is an unaltered forward of another communication received by this email account, or a referred source available on the internet and accessible to the public.
