------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net  2005-02-20 06:50 
-------
(In reply to comment #8)
> - nor does it seem to make sence in any circumstance to referance a wider
> logical value than may be stored in a register or memory, without presuming
> it's higher-order bits are of some known value (unless it's known that they're
> logical value were to be effectivly replaced by the operation without regard 
> to
> it's initial value)?

... or known not affect the operation (as would be typical of a shift count 
likely
never requiring more than a QI mode operand, although paradoxically a wider
operand may be formally required.) (it would seem)



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5169

Reply via email to