------- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-10-26 04:22 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I just tried valgrind. I'm not really familiar with valgrind, but as far
> as I can tell it reports no problems. So, either purify is wrong, valgrind
> is wrong, or they're both wrong in different ways.

Maybe "wrong" is too strong a statement, in this case. In practice, what often
makes a difference is that valgrind knows about many details of the GNU
environment (for instance about the underlying glibc) and is thus able to
automatically filter out many potential false positives. It does that via a
constantly updated so-called suppression file (see the manual, about that).
Anyway, I will double check myself in a few days...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29529

Reply via email to