------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-14 05:49 -------
This is actually caused by fortran/lang.opt which differs from c.opt in that it
RejectNegative's.

So if someone configures without fortran (Apple or you in this case), you will
get -Wno-all but if you configure with fortran, you don't.
c.opt:
Wall
C ObjC C++ ObjC++
Enable most warning messages


fortran/lang.opt:
Wall
Fortran RejectNegative
; Documented in C

java/lang.opt:
Wall
Java
; Documented for C

ada/lang.opt:
Wall
Ada
; Documented for C


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
          Component|driver                      |fortran
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
      Known to fail|4.1.2 4.3.0                 |4.0.0 4.0.4 4.1.1
      Known to work|4.0.1 4.1.1                 |3.4.0
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-01-14 05:49:41
               date|                            |
            Summary|-Wno-all is rejected        |[4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression]
                   |                            |-Wno-all is rejected when
                   |                            |fortran is included
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30437

Reply via email to