http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-16 08:13:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 24234 [details] > Proposed patch > > The attached patch seems to fix the testcase and doesn't > regress neon.exp. I'll test it fully next week. > We still generate more moves than necessary, but that's > a separate problem. I think we should try to preserve the existing internal API, so that if someone manages to pick up an older version of arm_neon.h they won't get bizarre errors out of the compiler.
