http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-06 15:07:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > I'm finding the LOCATION_BLOCK code somewhat opaque, and think that I should > take care of more recent regressions before diving into it too much, so I'm > going to put this aside for now. > > I don't remember the rationale for the extra block, but changing > finish_function to strip it right away causes quite a few testsuite > regressions. Can you attach your patch anyway, both for future reference and to find out why it causes testsuite regressions? I'm really curious...
