http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55935
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-11 09:18:41 UTC --- Created attachment 29142 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29142 gcc48-pr55935.patch Untested fix. Although the FE perhaps could unshare_expr_without_location so that ADDR_EXPRs in the ctor don't have location, IMHO gimple-fold.c still has to at least unshare_expr those expressions it copies from the constructors, otherwise we'll end up with invalid sharing of ADDR_EXPRs etc. between different functions (or within the same function). This can be reproduced even with C: void foo (void); struct S { int i; void (*fn) (); }; const struct S s = { 5, foo }; void *fn1 (int x) { if (x < 0) return s.fn; if (x) return 0; return s.fn; } void *fn2 (int x) { if (x < 0) return s.fn; if (x) return 0; return s.fn; } void *fn3 (void) { return s.fn; } void *fn4 (void) { return s.fn; } at -O2, in *.copyrename1 pass all 6 ADDR_EXPRs in the IL are still shared. ccp1 for whatever reason unshares them all (surprisingly).