http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139



Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:



           What    |Removed                     |Added

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org



--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-15 
09:25:45 UTC ---

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg01425.html

as an example of armv5tel-*-linux-gnueabi shows

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6t2-arm.c execution test

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6t2-thumb.c execution test

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv7a-arm.c execution test

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv7a-thumb.c execution test

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv7r-arm.c execution test

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv7r-thumb.c execution test

(not sure on what hw has it been run) and

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg01494.html

(armv7hl-*-linux-gnueabi), which shows

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv4t-thumb.c (test for excess errors)

UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv4t-thumb.c compilation failed to produce

executable

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv5t-thumb.c (test for excess errors)

UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv5t-thumb.c compilation failed to produce

executable

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv5te-thumb.c (test for excess errors)

UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv5te-thumb.c compilation failed to produce

executable

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6-thumb.c (test for excess errors)

UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6-thumb.c compilation failed to produce

executable

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6k-thumb.c (test for excess errors)

UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6k-thumb.c compilation failed to produce

executable

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6z-thumb.c (test for excess errors)

UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/ftest-armv6z-thumb.c compilation failed to produce

executable

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c (internal compiler error)

FAIL: gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c (test for excess errors)



All these tests are new for 4.8 and all test new functionality in 4.8, so the

regression status (beyond having some extra FAILs) is questionable.

Reply via email to