http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #17 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Daniel Marjamäki from comment #7)
> In my experience this type of check is really noisy if there is a warning
> for every fall through.
>
> I recommend that the warning is written only if the fall through cause
> redundant or bad behaviour. such as:
>
> switch (foo) {
> case 1: x = y; // <- redundant assignment
> case 2: x = z;
> };
I'd be happy with gcc warning for this kind of problem.
This specific case should be easier to catch than the
general case.
