https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |bernds at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #23)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #22)
> > Maybe we can put the error under some new flag though.
>
> Does Bernd's patch still work if we just warn instead of error? I still
> think doing this in the caller is the sane thing to do.
Yes, Bernd's patch still works then. I'd prefer this at this stage.
There doesn't seem to be any CPP_W_* that fits though.
