https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13)
> On Fri, 20 May 2016, andre.simoesdiasvieira at arm dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563
> >
> > Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvieira at arm dot com> changed:
> >
> > What |Removed |Added
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > CC| |andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.
> > | |com
> >
> > --- Comment #12 from Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvieira at arm dot com>
> > ---
> > Same regression observed on arm-none-eabi.
>
> Note the scanning is for final value replacement and it seems IVO now
> has an initial value using &a as well. So maybe instead scan the
> scev-ccp dump.
Haven't looked into it, but the use of &a in initial value is intended? Looks
like sccp failed to propagate last value of induction variable to a_p.
