https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #9)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> > Not that I like this proposal at all (given it changes function arg
> > evaluation order on x86_64).
>
> Does it?
> "the function is evaluated before all its arguments, but any pair of
> arguments (from the argument list) is indeterminately sequenced"
>
> The notation a(b1, b2, b3) means that there is no particular order between
> b1 and b2, otherwise it would be written a(b, c, d).
That's a variant of the proposal, but at the last meeting there was more of a
push toward requiring left-to-right evaluation.
