https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120
James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
If this is a 6 regression it may be more likely related to Kyrill's work on
if-converting arithmetic instructions ( r227368 and follow-ups) than my cost
work (which only landed for GCC 7) - though I'm sure my cost work won't have
helped as the impact of my changes would likely cause less if-conversion for
x86, which reports branches as cheap and conditional moves as expensive.
My ifcvt work for GCC 6 was more related to multiple sets in a basic block,
which I don't think this testcase requires.
