https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100593
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I understand what you're saying, but it seems we're talking past each other. I agree that if a library is linked with any -Bsymbolic* flag, the main executable is at risk of broken address uniqueness unless it uses GOT indirection. I am saying that if the library was linked with a more restrictive variant of -Bsymbolic (that I called -Bsymbolic-plt), it would still get most the benefit of -Bsymbolic, while remaining compatible with unmodified executables. Would you agree?
