https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Pierre-Emmanuel Patry from comment #2) > I can see the problem with the message, but I don't think we can remove the > behavior as we have to match rustc's behavior. The compiler has to ICE when > meeting this identifier. I suggest changing the message to rustc's one "It > looks like you're trying to break rust; would you like some ICE?" and > removing the "gcc" identifier check. Really this sounds like a bad idea to copy 100% of what rustc does. Instead we should follow the rust language specification (hopefully that actually exists). While you are at it, it would be useful to add a link to the rust langauge specification (like there is for almost all other languages [I see objective-C is not listed]) to https://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html .
