> I think I did it that way because the old code tried to re-construct > the type of the original amount. I can surely simply use op1 here > if that is preferred.
Right, but it used the value of OP1 so I think the new code should as well. > Btw, do you happen to know any target that would excercise this code > choosing from x86, ppc, s390 and ia64? All have rotate instructions so this seems to be a wash. -- Eric Botcazou
