On Wed, 4 May 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >> I believe we usually don't do whitespace changes just for the sake >> of cleaning up things. >> >> Unless someone else indicates otherwise, I believe this patch is >> rejected. > I think we *should* make such formatting cleanups (not just trailing > whitespace removal, but other changes to match formatting conventions, > including fixing leading whitespace in C code to use tabs where it doesn't > as well as more visible changes) - as long as we are agreed on what the > convention is to follow
Joseph, if you'd like to approave Michael's patch, I explicitly non-object. On Wed, 4 May 2011, Mike Stump wrote: > gcc had that policy for years and years. To return to that, we just > need a maintainer to approve or pre-approve these changes. :-) Documentation may be a bit more relaxed, and if you have one doc maintainer approve and the other abstain that may be more boring that you might hope for. :-) Unless others strongly disagree, of course, still got respective area maintainers and global reviewers. Gerald
