On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Richard Earnshaw <rearn...@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:45 -0800, Carrot Wei wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Compile the following c code with options -march=armv7-a -mthumb -Os
>>
>> int foo (int s)
>> {
>>     return s == 1;
>> }
>>
>> GCC 4.6 generates:
>>
>> 00000000 <foo>:
>>    0:    f1a0 0301     sub.w    r3, r0, #1    // A
>>    4:    4258          negs    r0, r3
>>    6:    eb40 0003     adc.w    r0, r0, r3      // B
>>    a:    4770          bx    lr
>>
>> Notice that instructions A and B are 32 bits. In thumb2 we can use subs and 
>> adcs
>> instead so they will be 16 bits.
>>
>
> This sequence already contains an instruction that sets the flags as a
> necessary part of the sequence.  Why doesn't it also generate
> flag-corrupting variants of the other two instructions when the
> registers selected are suitable?  It seems silly to force the compiler
> to do yet more work to clean up this code.
>

This revised patch uses new adc insn which simply clobber the CC
register. For the sub instruction I still use the CC setting form
since the existing pattern subsi3_compare does this.

Tested on arm qemu without regression.

thanks
Carrot

ChangeLog:
2011-05-16  Wei Guozhi  <car...@google.com>

        PR target/46975
        * config/arm/arm.md (*addsi3_carryin_compare0_<optab>): New pattern.
        (peephole2 for conditional move): Generate 16 bit instructions.

ChangeLog:
2010-05-16  Wei Guozhi  <car...@google.com>

        PR target/46975
        * gcc.target/arm/pr46975.c: New testcase.

Index: testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr46975.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr46975.c  (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr46975.c  (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+/* { dg-options "-mthumb -Os" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb2_ok } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "subs" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "adcs" } } */
+
+int foo (int s)
+{
+      return s == 1;
+}
Index: config/arm/arm.md
===================================================================
--- config/arm/arm.md   (revision 173770)
+++ config/arm/arm.md   (working copy)
@@ -985,6 +985,17 @@
                      (const_string "alu_shift_reg")))]
 )

+(define_insn "*addsi3_carryin_clobercc_<optab>"
+  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r")
+       (plus:SI (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "%r")
+                         (match_operand:SI 2 "arm_rhs_operand" "rI"))
+                (LTUGEU:SI (reg:<cnb> CC_REGNUM) (const_int 0))))
+   (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))]
+   "TARGET_32BIT"
+   "adc%.\\t%0, %1, %2"
+   [(set_attr "conds" "set")]
+)
+
 (define_expand "incscc"
   [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r,r")
         (plus:SI (match_operator:SI 2 "arm_comparison_operator"
@@ -8788,14 +8799,19 @@
              (set (match_dup 0) (const_int 1)))
    (match_scratch:SI 3 "r")]
   "TARGET_32BIT"
-  [(set (match_dup 3) (minus:SI (match_dup 1) (match_dup 2)))
+  [(parallel
+    [(set (reg:CC CC_REGNUM)
+         (compare:CC (match_dup 1) (match_dup 2)))
+     (set (match_dup 3) (minus:SI (match_dup 1) (match_dup 2)))])
    (parallel
     [(set (reg:CC CC_REGNUM)
          (compare:CC (const_int 0) (match_dup 3)))
      (set (match_dup 0) (minus:SI (const_int 0) (match_dup 3)))])
-   (set (match_dup 0)
-       (plus:SI (plus:SI (match_dup 0) (match_dup 3))
-                (geu:SI (reg:CC CC_REGNUM) (const_int 0))))])
+   (parallel
+    [(set (match_dup 0)
+         (plus:SI (plus:SI (match_dup 0) (match_dup 3))
+                  (geu:SI (reg:CC CC_REGNUM) (const_int 0))))
+     (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))])])

 (define_insn "*cond_move"
   [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r,r,r")

Reply via email to