Hi!
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 23:28:49 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang <chunglin_t...@mentor.com>
wrote:
> On 2018/12/7 6:26 AM, Julian Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 22:22:46 +0000
> > Julian Brown <jul...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 21:42:14 +0100
> >> Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> [...]
> >>> ..., where the "Invalid read of size 8" happens, and which
> >>> eventually would try to "free (tgt)" again, via
> >>> libgomp/target.c:gomp_unmap_tgt:
> >>>
> >>> attribute_hidden void
> >>> gomp_unmap_tgt (struct target_mem_desc *tgt)
> >>> {
> >>> /* Deallocate on target the tgt->tgt_start .. tgt->tgt_end
> >>> region. */ if (tgt->tgt_end)
> >>> gomp_free_device_memory (tgt->device_descr, tgt->to_free);
> >>>
> >>> free (tgt->array);
> >>> free (tgt);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> Is the "free (tgt)" in libgomp/target.c:gomp_unmap_vars_async wrong,
> >>> or something else?
> >>
> >> It might be worth trying this with the refcounting changes in the
> >> attach/detach patch.
Well, which exactly?
> > ...oh, also make sure you have this patch in the series you're testing
> > with:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg01973.html
> >
> > else your "wait" will be ignored, IIUC.
Thanks, and right, and yes, I got that one included.
> just first asking if you tried Julian's patch during this time, and if so did
> it do anything different?
I did not test with all the attach/detach patches on top of this one
here. That's too many changes at once.
Grüße
Thomas
