Many thanks, sir! I will look into it. Paul
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 17:43, Dominique d'Humières <domi...@lps.ens.fr> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > With your patch the test gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_9.f90 fails in the > 32 bit mode, due to the errors > > /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_9.f90:24:6: > Error: Type mismatch in argument 'expected' at (1); passed INTEGER(4) to > INTEGER(8) > /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_9.f90:25:6: > Error: Type mismatch in argument 'expected' at (1); passed INTEGER(4) to > INTEGER(8) > /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_9.f90:26:6: > Error: Type mismatch in argument 'expected' at (1); passed INTEGER(4) to > INTEGER(8) > /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_9.f90:27:6: > Error: Type mismatch in argument 'expected' at (1); passed INTEGER(4) to > INTEGER(8) > > Note that LOC is a gnu extension. > > The patch also fixes pr89846 for -m64, but not for -m32 > > % gfc pr89846.c pr89846.f90 -m32 > % a.out > FAIL 2: > FAIL 4: > % gfc pr89846.c pr89846.f90 > % a.out > OK > OK > > TIA > > Dominique > -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
