Hello, On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Will update the patch, I think any improvement should be done > > to get_range_pos_neg (it's a bit odd in behavior for unsigned > > but I have only signed things incoming). > > For unsigned if it always returned 1, it would be quite useless, there would > be no point for the caller to call it in that case. Which seems to make sense for a function called ...pos_neg on unsigned types. I would expect calling it to be useless and always return "yep, non-negative, why did you ask?". Ciao, Michael.
