On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 9:02 AM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
<stefa...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Revert parameter max-completely-peel-times to 16, otherwise, the
> innermost loop is removed and we are left with no loop interchange which
> this test is all about.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-interchange-16.c: Revert parameter
> max-completely-peel-times for s390.
> ---
> Ok for mainline?
Can you check whether placing
#pragma GCC unroll 0
before the innermost loop works as well? That'd be more to the point.
OK if that works.
thanks,
Richard.
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-interchange-16.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-interchange-16.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-interchange-16.c
> index 781555e085d..2530ec84bc0 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-interchange-16.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-interchange-16.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> /* PR/101280 */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-options "-O3 -fdump-tree-linterchange-details" } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "--param max-completely-peel-times=16" { target
> s390*-*-* } } */
>
> void dummy (double *, double *);
> #define LEN_2D 32
> --
> 2.43.0
>
