On 10/24/2010 10:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > It's hard for me to believe that BFD is the correct answer. It's poorly > designed for the kinds of things the compiler needs to do. Any program > which links against BFD effectively links in the GNU linker.
It sounded from your mail like all the compiler needs to do is to read the binary contents of a named section. Isn't that something that BFD does well? -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
