On 10/28/2010 6:31 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > This patch requires approval from the LTO maintainers. I don't need > approval for the libiberty changes (if the code stays in libiberty) but > of course I would appreciate it if somebody could look it over. I think > the configure and Makefile changes are sufficiently obvious given the > other changes as to not require approval.
This all looks good to me, and seems like a reasonable solution. I think libiberty is as good a place as any for the routines, FWIW. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
