On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 17:03, Nick Treleaven <nick.trelea...@btinternet.com> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:47:08 +0200 > Jiří Techet <tec...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Attached you'll find a patch that updates the regex library to the >> latest version from glibc. This removes the warnings Lex was >> experiencing on a 64bit machine. I looked at how ctags does it and >> made the patch in a similar way. > > I'm not sure if the glibc version will build on Windows. I don't have a > Windows build environment set up ATM to try it. > > It might be best to use the version from latest CTags. The > gnu_regex/README.txt says: > "Minor changes were made to eliminate compiler errors and warnings." > > Using the same version as CTags could potentially also prevent any > regex-incompatibility bugs with CTags parsers.
As far as I remember the CTags version and the glibc version of regex are basically the same. I also changed some symbol name in the regex sources because of a conflict with some symbol in my system header files. Jiri > > Regards, > Nick > _______________________________________________ > Geany-devel mailing list > Geany-devel@uvena.de > http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel > _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel