On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 23:46, Thomas Martitz <thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de> wrote: > Am 30.04.2011 11:48, schrieb Matthew Brush: >> >> I think the more important part is, are the core developers going to >> accept pull/merge requests on github/gitorious, apply commits/patches from >> there, etc.? If it's only going to be another read-only git mirror, it's >> kind of pointless. I don't mean to say that it's a bad idea to have the >> "official Geany source" available on various projects sites to fork/hack on >> and stuff, just that it doesn't address the problem being discussed at all. > > I agree it's not as useful, but I disagree that it'd be pointless. We can > still benefit from the "social coding" aspects of github, including but not > limited to an overview over the forks, pull requests between forks. I would > greatly love to see that, as I'm subscribed to a number forks by now :)
Yes, I would also prefer if there was a proper and complete git switch (it would greatly save maintainer's work IMO) but I haven't seen much enthusiasm from the core developers for the move so it's better if people who use git have at least an up-to-date git mirror from which they can create their private branches. > > BTW: is there some possibility to have an svn mirror of a git repo. Perhaps > if you have admin access to the bare svn repo? I guess you could git svn dcommit from the post-receive hook if you have access to the git repository. But I guess it works for simple commits only and not merges and so on. (To your question regarding writing my name - I write it that way myself too because I'm lazy to switch to Czech keyboard so I guess it's OK ;-) Jiri _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel