On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Russell Shaw wrote:
If you fill the package with PDFs, it'll get rejected or repackaged by any decent Debian maintainer to have a separate documentation package. With the current build problems, it's lucky to be accepted into any distribution at all.
This is an interesting and valid point. I didn't think about that. The solution is that the .deb packages submitted to the Debian project won't have .pdfs in them. However, any packages living on the gEDA project's webpage can have whatever we want in them (as long as it is not illegal). The same holds true for any other project's packages. I realize that it then becomes a problem for the Debian packager to strip out the .pdfs. One might have a debian-dist target in the Makefile to deal with this. Stuart _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list geda-dev@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
