Jan Heller wrote: > On 17:55, Mon 10 Mar 08, Martin Nordholts wrote: > >> That looks very interesting. Do you think you could provide some >> benchmarking data of the performance improvements in variuos situations? >> It would be useful to have >> > > Hi, > > I used babl/tests/babl_fish_path_dhtml as a simple > benchmark. Here are running times of babl_fish_path_dhtml > w/o and w/ the patch applied:
Hello again Sorry for being slow here This is pretty impressive results I must say. I have created a bug report about it in bugzilla [1] so we can track the patch while we integrate it into Babl. Best regards, Martin Nordholts [1] Bug 523507 – [PATCH] New database backend based on a coalesced hashtable http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523507
_______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer