> On 2011-06-09 11:17:24, Gabe Black wrote:
> > This isn't a review, just a thought on the question you're asking. If the 
> > access is speculative, is it ok to use a misspeculated pc since the 
> > instruction will be thrown out anyway?

Actually after briefly looking at the code, I wonder if we don't have a bigger 
problem here.  I'm assuming that the ThreadContext struct reflects the 
committed state of the machine, where we really want the state relative to this 
in-flight instruction.  Have we just been getting lucky so far?  Seems like in 
Alpha the TLB only uses the PC to see if it's in PAL mode or not, so maybe the 
pipeline gets flushed when we switch in and out of PAL mode and thus there's 
never an inconsistency there even in O3.  (Nate or Ali, can you confirm this?)

Korey, can you elaborate on the kind of errors you were running into without 
this change?

Technically I think perhaps the TLB should be using the ExecContext interface 
instead of the ThreadContext, but since ExecContext isn't a real object, that 
only works if you template the call... I wonder if we really should be using 
something like the ProxyThreadContext (see cpu/thread_context.hh) wrapped 
around a DynInst.  Does that make sense?


- Steve


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/743/#review1311
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2011-06-08 23:34:50, Korey Sewell wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/743/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-06-08 23:34:50)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and 
> Nathan Binkert.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> inorder/dtb: make sure DTB translate correct address
> The DTB expects the correct PC in the ThreadContext
> but how if the memory accesses are speculative? Shouldn't
> we send along the requestor's PC to the translate functions?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc 77d12d8f7971 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/743/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Korey
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to