On Sunday 19 March 2006 20:46, Leo Simons wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:41:04AM +0000, James Strachan wrote: > > (i) don't use the incubator code, but fork it elsewhere (say to > > codehaus) and make releases there if Geronimo needs bug fixes > > (ii) Geronimo use incubator release candidate releases > > (iii) ActiveMQ performs actual releases that Geronimo can depend on > > and use but put sufficient warnings in the jars that these are still > > in the incubator
> Once again, my preference doesn't really matter. Its just an opinion, and > the geronimo project needs to make the decisions. That said... > > I think we have an imperfect situation now that starts with "incubation > release" being confusing, and this trickles through into an imperfect > situation for geronimo when having to pick between these. Nah... do iv) Stick the whole of Geronimo back into Incubation. Problem solved ;o) ... just kidding. Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
