This thread may be dead/resolved, in which case just ignore me. Cliff Schmidt wrote: > On 6/23/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The use of e-mail as the primary means for communication is part of ASF >> policy and philosophy, and we can certainly learn lessons from >> projects that >> have gone against it. IRC tends to breed a more closed, albeit arguably >> more integrated, community. >> >> That said, if IRC can be used as a learning tool to rapidly bring new >> people >> up to speed, and if the information gathered from those sessions is >> preserved for others to follow up via web-site and e-mail, how do people >> perceive that? > > I've never done that on a project, but I think it could be a > reasonable thing for a project to try. I believe the Synapse folks > have been doing regular IRC meetings from early on. I'd be interested > in their perspective on the pros and cons, particularly as an > incubating project.
Someone did point out that dev traffic is falling off while commit traffic is same or increasing. > > As a XAP mentor, I know that the committers already understand that no > decisions will be made over IRC, that logs of each IRC will be > immediately made available to the entire community, and that they need > to be sensitive to any concerns from people wishing but unable to > participate. But, are there other thoughts from the Synapse folks or > anyone else who has used regular IRC meetings? I think that people can have that understanding, but I think that it doesn't matter - it's been my experience that while people are able to quote the letter of the law as well as the explain the reason behind it, people unintentionally make "informal decisions" on IRC and execute on them, all with the best of intentions. I know i've seen it with Geronimo, and it can be very disruptive, even though it may be accidental. I think lots of decisions made on dev lists are the same - informal - without the trappings of a vote or such, because many decisions are made by "lazy consensus" - people discuss things or search for help, and then continue down whatever modified path the group explicitly or implicitly agreed to. In the case of XAP, I'm guessing that many of the committers are employees or contractors/consultants of Nexaweb. Were I a mentor, I'd want to be sure that pre-existing development process is being sufficiently broken up to make it an Apache community development project, and would worry that regular IRC meetings might be confused with periodic development meetings... geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
