Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >> Noel J. Bergman wrote: >>> Wait ... why can't a specification be a releasable, just like a >>> codebase? The only issue, as I see it, would be enforcement of >>> compliance. And Roy even put forward a proposed license amendment >>> for such things. >> Which license amendment? The license amendment that I'm thinking of was >> specific to JCP TCKs and how derivative works of a TCK can't be used for >> compatibility - it had nothing to do w/ enforcement of compliance with a >> spec. > <grrr mail client changed?>
> The JSR licemse, not the TCK license. I don't remember a JSR license. I remember an addendum for an RI, and an addendum for a TCK. > Not that it can't be modified, > but what else would you call the clauses forbidding the use of the > trademark names, references to the specification, and restricted > name space unless the code passed the TCK? Dunno, but different than enforced compliance. geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
