C. Michael Pilato wrote: > >>Our goal is to bring our Serf integration up to the quality (in terms of >>both user experience and proper API adherence) of our Neon one so that Serf >>can safely become the new default DAV RA implementation, yes. It's mostly >>there, but still contains a few gotchas. We've switched our trunk >>(1.7-aimed) code to use Serf as the default if both it and Neon are found, >>but that change could be reverted (restoring the use of Neon as the default) >>if we aren't able to iron out the Serf integration shortcomings in a timely >>fashion. >
Michael, this is a very good news and it's good that you work on it now, because licensing issues (Neon license incompatibility) are very important for us. Hope that you will manage to do it if for SVN 1.7. Thanks, Igor -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-PROPOSAL--VOTE--Subversion-tp26203843p26280942.html Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
