On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ant, > > My personal opinion (and i am hoping!) was that such individuals from ppmc's > who end up in ipmc would help build bridges between podlings and will help > get lessons learned (when any ppmc has issues/problems/roadblocks) back to > their ppmc.
Isn't that sort of thing exactly what hasn't happened in past projects with sub projects and why these days sub projects often get moved out to be TLPs? If a poddlings active committers warrent being on the IPMC why not graduate the poddling or give the poddling its own PMC? It would be good for poddlings to have more control over their own activities like voting committers and releases and this would give them that which is good so i guess I wouldn't stand in the way of trying it, but doing it with this approach does feel like we'd just be creating another great big umbrella project with all the issues that has. ...ant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
