Pierre, You're probably correct. I only went through this month/last month, not the prior month so no one from group 3 would have been in my email.
With that said, knowing that you're on Trafodion, what are you doing to help Trafodion graduate? Is anyone bringing up the discussion? My point with this email - podlings need to take it upon themselves to graduate, the most the IPMC can be doing is nudging along. We only provide a recommendation vote. John On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:52 AM Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I guess it should be brought > back regularly so that participants here stay on the ball. > > That being said, I believe Trafodion should also be considered to be ready. > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:28 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > All, > > > > As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63 active podlings. While > > I've been chasing retiring podlings, I think it would be good for the > > community as a whole to look closely as podlings and see what we can do > to > > graduate podlings that seem to be doing well. > > > > Take a look at the last two reports: > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017 > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 > > > > Last month, I listed 4 podlings that appear to have completed all > > graduation requirements, but remain in the incubator (Airflow, BatchEE, > > Freemarker, Metron). I didn't include that in February, but if I had to > > list the names, it would be: CarbonData, Edgent, Fineract, Guacamole, > > PredictionIO, SystemML, Tamaya, Unomi (but that's entirely my POV/opinion > > unless others want to chime in). > > > > So I'm curious, what can others do to help these 12 podlings get past the > > finish line? > > > > John > > >
