+0 I like this, I think it is needed, as it should help to extend the experience and knowledge of the community by acknowledging the services of non-coders.
I believe, though, that as sub-projects grow we will eventually need to address the issue of scope, but in the meantime this would be an improvement. But Pier, it doesn't address your original problem though, does it? Which was about the "bar height", or how to encourage contributors, and increase the number of contributors without diluting, and clogging up, the community and decision making processes. d. > - committer: is a contributor, but also a member, therefore he has all the > privileges and dues of a contributor (having CVS access, and > overlooking the > code he's contributing to) and of a member (can vote for PMCs, should > participate and contribute to discussions on the overall structure of > Jakarta). > > I believe this makes sense, more sense than what we have now, also because > we've seen that happening in the ASF for the very first time with a > non-coding member. Comments please? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
